I know, I know, this blog was largely about the attribution cartel for a while, and it seems like my numbers started to go up while I was doing semi-regular updates on that—so shouldn’t I be writing about the attribution cartel more?

For now, not much is happening over there. They’re still going through the motions of trying to make centralized ad attribution tracking into a web standard. Which is kind of weird, considering that we should all know by now that centralization on a few USA-based companies is a bad idea (See Dutch tax office drops Microsoft 365 cloud for own servers and open source by Alina Maria Stan. The #Eurostack, so hot right now.)

The attribution numbers are going to agree with what’s politically expedient for the attribution cartel companies.

The name of this lake is what the US government says it is

Check out the Kyiv Independent site, read ‘Will only lead to more slaughter’ — bipartisan backlash erupts in US over Trump-Russia diesel deal, and then predict how well any pro-Ukraine news site is going to do in the attribution cartel reports.

Yeah, I didn’t think so.

In order to get good ratings from the attribution cartel, sites are going to have to cover the International Criminal Court in the politically approved way, too.

George Orwell wrote, The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. And now, the Big Tech CEOs don’t wait to be commanded. On the timeline where the attribution cartel succeeds, we’ll see that according to the privacy-preserving attribution tracking, slop and pro-oligarch sites sell, and legit sites, not so much.