More money and better stuff for people in the UK
Some good news last week: Meta
settles UK ‘right to object to ad-tracking’ lawsuit by agreeing not to
track plaintiff. Tanya O’Carroll, in the UK, has settled a case with
Meta, and the company must stop using her data for ad targeting when
she uses its services.
It’s not a change for everyone, though, since
the settlement is just for one person. O’Carroll said she is unable
to disclose full details of the tracking-free access Meta will be
providing in her case but she confirmed that she will not have to pay
Meta.
The Open Rights Group now has a Meta opt-out page that anyone in the UK can use to do an opt out under the UK GDPR.
If you use any Meta products – Facebook, Instagram, Meta Quest or VR, Threads or WhatsApp – you can use our tool to request that they no longer collect or process your data for advertising. This is known as your right to object, which is enshrined in data protection law. Meta had tried to get around GDPR, but by settling Tanya’s case they have admitted that they need to give their users this right.
If you’re in the UK, you can either use the form on the site, or use the mailto link to open up a new regular email from your own account pre-populated with the opt out text. This is a win not just because it could mean less money for a transnational criminal organization and more money staying in the UK, but also because it’s going to mean better products and services for the people who do it.
Opt outs are one layer in the onion.
Don’t do a surveilled activity
Block the transfer of tracking data
Generate tracking data that is hard to link to you
Set an opt out while doing the surveilled activity
Send an opt out or Right to Delete after doing the surveilled activity
Having access to this new tool doesn’t mean not to do the others. Even if I could figure out how to use the Meta apps in a way that’s totally safe for me, it’s still a win to switch away because it helps build network effects for the alternatives and more safety for other people. So even if you do this opt out, it’s also a good idea to do the other effective privacy tips.
How this gets you more money and better stuff
Turning off the personalized
ads is a bigger deal than it
looks like. The
arguments from advertising personalization fans don’t reflect the best
research on the subject. Ad personalization systems, especially on
Facebook, are designed to give some hard-to-overcome advantages to
deceptive advertisers. Any limitations to personalization look like a
big win, shopping-wise. In one study, turning on an Apple privacy
setting reduced reported
fraud losses by 4.7%.
The personalization of ads on Facebook helps vendors of crappy, misrepresented goods match their products to the shoppers who are most likely to fall for their bullshit. Yes, you can follow the advice in articles like Don’t Get Scammed! Tips For Spotting AI-Generated Fake Products Online on Bellingcat, but it’s a time-saver and an extra layer of protection not to get the scam ad in the first place.
Privacy tools and settings that limit ad personalization have been available for quite a while. If people who use them were buying worse stuff, the surveillance industry would have said so by now. Anyway, if you’re in the UK, go do the Meta opt-out.
In other countries, other effective privacy tips are still a win.
Bonus links
THE WHITE COAT DIDN’T BETRAY YOU—THE PIXEL DID: Judge Keeps Florida Wiretap Case Against Hospital Alive by Blake Landis. (Interesting legal direction in the USA: many states have wiretapping laws that may or may not apply to the Meta Pixel and CAPI.)
Applying
the Fundamental Axioms to Reduce Uncertainty by Joe Gregorio.
Would it be bad form to point out that the entire edifice of “Agile”
software development is built on a bed of lies?
(I don’t know. Read
the whole thing and make up your own mind? Related: Day-to-day experiences
with bug futures
Why
We Need Shortwave 2.0
by Kim Andrew Elliott on Radio World.
Because
(Then you need a program to
convert the encoded signal into text and/or images—or this functionality
could be built into future inexpensive radios.)Shortwave Radiogram
is transmitted on a regular
amplitude-modulated shortwave transmitter, it can be received on any
shortwave radio, from inexpensive portable radios with no sideband
capability, to more elaborate communications receivers, amateur
transceivers (most of which nowadays have general coverage receivers),
and software defined radios (SDRs).