Team A vs. Team B
11 February 2018
Let's run a technical challenge on the Internet. Team A vs. Team B.
Team A gets to work where they want, when they want. Team B has to work in an open-plan office, with people walking behind them, talking on the phone, doing all that annoying office stuff.
Members of Team A get paid for successful work within weeks or months. Members of Team B get a base salary that they have to spend on rent in an expensive location, but just might get paid extra for successful work in four years.
Team A will let anyone try to join, and those who aren't successful have to drop out quickly. Team B will only let members who are a "good cultural fit" join, and it takes a while to get rid of an unsuccessful member.
Team A can deploy unproven work for real-world testing, using infrastructure that they get for free on the Internet. Team B can only deploy their work when production-ready, on infrastructure they have to pay for.
If Team A breaks the rules, the penalty is that they have to spend a little money to register new domain names. If Team B breaks the rules, they risk lengthy regulatory and/or legal consequences.
Team A scores a win any time they can beat whoever is the weakest member of Team B at that time. Team B can only score a win when they can consistently defeat all of the most active members of Team A.
Team A is adfraud.
Why is so much marketing money being bet on Team B?