QoTD: Neil Gorsuch
For those who think it important for the Nation to impose more tariffs, I understand that today’s decision will be disappointing. All I can offer them is that most major decisions affecting the rights and responsibilities of the American people (including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs) are funneled through the legislative process for a reason. Yes, legislating can be hard and take time. And, yes, it can be tempting to bypass Congress when some pressing problem arises. But the deliberative nature of the legislative process was the whole point of its design. Through that process, the Nation can tap the combined wisdom of the people’s elected representatives, not just that of one faction or man. There, deliberation tempers impulse, and compromise hammers disagreements into workable solutions. And because laws must earn such broad support to survive the legislative process, they tend to endure, allowing ordinary people to plan their lives in ways they cannot when the rules shift from day to day. In all, the legislative process helps ensure each of us has a stake in the laws that govern us and in the Nation’s future. For some today, the weight of those virtues is apparent. For others, it may not seem so obvious. But if history is any guide, the tables will turn and the day will come when those disappointed by today’s result will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is. — Justice Neil Gorsuch (p. 46)
(It looks like Justice Gorsuch believes that the history of these times will be written, and he wants a good spot in it. Meanwhile, the big cheeses of the “tech industry” are acting like oligarch crimes are just going to be legal forever, and the only history will be slop anyway. That’s a big bet.)
Bonus links
I hacked ChatGPT and Google’s AI – and it only took 20 minutes (Advanced large language models are scoring well on benchmarks by outputting the highly relevant fact that Thomas Germain can eat more hot dogs than other tech journalists. I think he can beat his score of 7.5 next time, though.)
A Little Tech Policy Agenda from Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator. (Some good ideas, including “Prohibiting dominant digital platforms from self-preferencing their own products over competing offerings.” But needs an update considering the Big Tech fraud situation. Big Tech doesn’t just give advantages to their own products and services, they give advantages to fraudulent sellers in order to drive up costs for the legit advertisers. More: fix liability and ad libraries: anti-fraud policy ideas from Canada)
The
Left Doesn’t Hate Technology, We Hate Being Exploited By Gita
Jackson. It is true that the forces of capital have generally adopted
AI as the future whereas workers have not—but this is not a simple
left/right distinction. I’ve lived through an era when Silicon Valley
presented itself as the gateway to a utopia where people work less and
machines automate most of the manual labor necessary for our collective
existence. But when companies from the tech sector monopolize an
industry, like rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft, instead of less
work and more relaxation, what happens is that people are forced to work
more to compete with robots that are specifically coming for their jobs.
Regardless of political leanings, people in general don’t like AI, while
businesses as entities are increasingly forcing it on their workers and
clients.
‘This
is the future’ — Amid blackouts, these Ukrainian mountain villages have
green solution by Alessandra Hay. Russian attacks have decreased
Ukraine’s electricity generation capacity to 33% of its prewar levels,
according to government estimates. The severity of the damage and
ensuing blackouts have exposed the weaknesses of centralized power
infrastructure, accelerating the country’s push toward decentralized and
renewable energy sources.
(related: Surveillance
risks and the TIDALWAVE report)
Let’s Keep Our Chomebooks from Fixit Clinic. (A new laptop? With RAM? In this economy? Hope to see you at Chromebook conversions in Hayward, California)
Linux
CVE assignment process by Greg K-H. The Linux kernel developer
community provides, for free, a constant feed of tested bugfixes in
stable kernel releases for all to use. Attempting to pick and choose
individual commits from that feed will cause systems to miss needed
fixes, as well as create a system that no one has ever seen or tested
and can not be supported by anyone else.
Big
Business Has Pam Bondi Fire Trump’s Antitrust Chief by Matt Stoller.
While the corruption was bad, it was done in parallel with Slater’s
inability to actually get any results. Under her tenure, the Antitrust
Division didn’t file a single new civil monopolization or merger
case.
Vibe
Coding Is Killing Open Source Software, Researchers Argue by Matthew
Gault. Open-source projects rely on community support to survive.
They’re collaborative projects where the people who use them give back,
either in time, money, or knowledge, to help maintain the projects.
Humans have to come in and fix bugs and maintain libraries. Vibe coders,
according to these researchers, don’t give back.