previously: CCPA and CIPA on the same site. It is possible to comply with both “flavors” of California privacy law—CCPA and CIPA—by setting up one flow for the Global Privacy Control users, and another flow for people who prefer cross-context personalized advertising. One question, though. Would everybody who wants personalized ads be locked in to Rewarded Interest?

The second option I covered includes Rewarded Interest (which just came out in Apple’s App Store, by the way. Pretty straightforward answer to the problem of how to provide personalized ads to Apple users who want them.)

But there is only one Rewarded Interest, and GPC users can choose any browser. By January all the browsers are going to have to offer it.

Rewarded Interest doesn’t have lock-in, though. It is designed to integrate with the existing OpenRTB web ads. And there’s nothing preventing some competitor from offering their own user ID system that plugs in to OpenRTB the same way.

One company is an obvious contender to offer an alternative ID—and they’re already well-known as a fast follower on software.

  • Amazon has buy-side adtech, Amazon Ads Agent, a ready-to-go integration for their version of CMAID, whatever they call it.

  • Amazon has plenty of bonus offers to reward people for their data, so they don’t have to pay out all rewards in cash.

  • Amazon already has a first-party relationship with most households in the USA.

So the answer is no. People who choose personalization will end up with more than one option. They’ll pick an ID to use based on which one gives them the best deal. I don’t know if that will be Amazon or someone else. This is a competition problem for Rewarded Interest, not a lock-in problem for the people who choose personalized ads.